Antonov AN 124 Ruslan

  • Quorneng
  • Quorneng's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Forum Master
  • Forum Master
More
25 Jun 2019 17:24 - 25 Jun 2019 17:26 #1 by Quorneng
Antonov AN 124 Rusian was created by Quorneng
First I have no intention of building one in Depron or anything else.:woohoo:

Out of curiosity I wondered how big it would be if it used the drone motors and 5x3.5 four blade props I used in my Airbus A350.
From this 3 view

the answer is 2.4 m span and 2.26 m long.
Even with a removable wing it would not fit inside my car!
Attachments:
Last edit: 25 Jun 2019 17:26 by Quorneng.
Thanks: Eric, Klipkopwildlife, THE BLACKBIRD, crash happy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
25 Jun 2019 20:32 #2 by paul d
Replied by paul d on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
Wanna buy a roof rack ?

balsa is best.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
25 Jun 2019 20:32 #3 by THE BLACKBIRD
Replied by THE BLACKBIRD on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
It would look great though
Hmmm bigger car needed, have a word with the misses :angry: :P

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Quorneng
  • Quorneng's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Forum Master
  • Forum Master
More
26 Jun 2019 15:49 #4 by Quorneng
Replied by Quorneng on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
And to cap it all I certainly don't have enough Depron to make such a huge plane!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
26 Jun 2019 17:24 #5 by Eric
Replied by Eric on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
Excuses excuses!
Two piece wing, and two piece fuz, split just behind the mainplane te.
[badass]

if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
26 Jun 2019 17:30 #6 by THE BLACKBIRD
Replied by THE BLACKBIRD on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
I have the depron sir as promised to you :evil: :evil:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
26 Jun 2019 20:26 #7 by paul d
Replied by paul d on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
There's always balsa....

balsa is best.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Quorneng
  • Quorneng's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Forum Master
  • Forum Master
More
26 Jun 2019 21:58 #8 by Quorneng
Replied by Quorneng on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
BB
To even consider another Depron plane bigger than something quite small I will have to take you up on that offer! :P

paul d
So far I have been unable to create in balsa anything as light as in Depron.
Balsa, apart from greater cost, would require more powerful motors, bigger batteries and result in a faster flying speed which would I fear make an undercarriage and a smooth field a necessity.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Quorneng
  • Quorneng's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Forum Master
  • Forum Master
More
30 Jun 2019 23:03 #9 by Quorneng
Replied by Quorneng on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
I just couldn't resit having a bit of a doodle for the engine nacelles of the AN 124.

If I was going to make an AN 124 the nacelle inner duct, motor mount and pylon would be printed in a similar manner to the A350, particularly as there would be 4 to do!
Attachments:
Thanks: Klipkopwildlife

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Jul 2019 00:29 #10 by THE BLACKBIRD
Replied by THE BLACKBIRD on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
Hmmm if you will be printing 4 of them you may as well print 6 and do the big one the 225 ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
01 Jul 2019 07:50 #11 by Eric
Replied by Eric on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
Simon would need to print himself a bigger car first! [badass]

if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Quorneng
  • Quorneng's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Forum Master
  • Forum Master
More
15 Jul 2019 15:50 #12 by Quorneng
Replied by Quorneng on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
I can't actually print anything at the moment cause it is broken but against my better judgement I did a bit of 'playing' with CAD.
An image of a 'test' AN 124 nacelle.


The pylon is wrong (copied from the A350) but the nacelle is more or less right although the inlet needs to be canted forward by 4 degrees.

Actually build it? No way!
Attachments:
Thanks: Klipkopwildlife, THE BLACKBIRD, Ralpharr2001

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jul 2019 19:51 #13 by THE BLACKBIRD
Replied by THE BLACKBIRD on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
I was looking at that depron when cleaning up my shed tonight
Funny i was thinking that would look good turned into a Antonov
[badass]

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
15 Jul 2019 21:46 #14 by Eric
Replied by Eric on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
The seed has been planted. Give it time to germinate! :evil:

if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Quorneng
  • Quorneng's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Forum Master
  • Forum Master
More
19 Jul 2019 14:05 - 19 Jul 2019 14:11 #15 by Quorneng
Replied by Quorneng on topic Antonov AN 124 Rusian
As i commented in the "MY NEW MODEL ROOM AND HANGER" thread I absolutely cannot build any more planes until I have some more room, but that does not stop me doing some 'electronic' thinking about it.
The fuselage side view converted to a one pixel wide line drawing.

When all the cross sections are similarly converted and printed out at the required size it would be enough info to start building the fuselage.
However the issue of 'undercarriage' has to be resolved first.
For its size as an EDF it will not have an excess of thrust so weight will be critical.
Hand launch/belly gives the lightest option (as I did on my Airbus A350) but the AN124 fuselage will be so broad it will be impossible to hold to launch! :woohoo:
The next issue is that long 5 tandem wheel undercarriage would stop it being able to 'rotate' thus preventing a take off unless flaps are deployed.
The next lightest option would then be to have a fixed U/C and flaps but then all flying will have to be conducted in a 'take off' configuration.
Retractable U/C and movable laps would almost certainly be beyond the capability of the intended lightweight (and cheap!) drone based EDFs.

Still thinking!

p s If a mod can find the time my mistake but the name in the title should be Ruslan (Lion in Russian) with an 'l' not an "i".
Attachments:
Last edit: 19 Jul 2019 14:11 by Quorneng.
Thanks: Klipkopwildlife, THE BLACKBIRD, crash happy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.288 seconds