- Posts: 10058
- Thank you received: 19043
Antonov AN 124 Ruslan
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
Out of curiosity I wondered how big it would be if it used the drone motors and 5x3.5 four blade props I used in my Airbus A350.
From this 3 view
the answer is 2.4 m span and 2.26 m long.
Even with a removable wing it would not fit inside my car!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- paul d
-
- Offline
- Forum Veteran
-
- Posts: 2074
- Thank you received: 2292
- THE BLACKBIRD
-
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 6781
- Thank you received: 10722
Hmmm bigger car needed, have a word with the misses
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 10058
- Thank you received: 19043
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 15407
- Thank you received: 14307
Two piece wing, and two piece fuz, split just behind the mainplane te.
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- THE BLACKBIRD
-
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 6781
- Thank you received: 10722
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- paul d
-
- Offline
- Forum Veteran
-
- Posts: 2074
- Thank you received: 2292
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 10058
- Thank you received: 19043
To even consider another Depron plane bigger than something quite small I will have to take you up on that offer!
paul d
So far I have been unable to create in balsa anything as light as in Depron.
Balsa, apart from greater cost, would require more powerful motors, bigger batteries and result in a faster flying speed which would I fear make an undercarriage and a smooth field a necessity.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 10058
- Thank you received: 19043
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- THE BLACKBIRD
-
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 6781
- Thank you received: 10722
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 15407
- Thank you received: 14307
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 10058
- Thank you received: 19043
An image of a 'test' AN 124 nacelle.
The pylon is wrong (copied from the A350) but the nacelle is more or less right although the inlet needs to be canted forward by 4 degrees.
Actually build it? No way!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- THE BLACKBIRD
-
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 6781
- Thank you received: 10722
Funny i was thinking that would look good turned into a Antonov
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 15407
- Thank you received: 14307
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 10058
- Thank you received: 19043
The fuselage side view converted to a one pixel wide line drawing.
When all the cross sections are similarly converted and printed out at the required size it would be enough info to start building the fuselage.
However the issue of 'undercarriage' has to be resolved first.
For its size as an EDF it will not have an excess of thrust so weight will be critical.
Hand launch/belly gives the lightest option (as I did on my Airbus A350) but the AN124 fuselage will be so broad it will be impossible to hold to launch!
The next issue is that long 5 tandem wheel undercarriage would stop it being able to 'rotate' thus preventing a take off unless flaps are deployed.
The next lightest option would then be to have a fixed U/C and flaps but then all flying will have to be conducted in a 'take off' configuration.
Retractable U/C and movable laps would almost certainly be beyond the capability of the intended lightweight (and cheap!) drone based EDFs.
Still thinking!
p s If a mod can find the time my mistake but the name in the title should be Ruslan (Lion in Russian) with an 'l' not an "i".
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.