- Posts: 1392
- Thank you received: 1420
Sea Vixen - profile (no-cal) FF model for DF
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
I'm aiming to use a pair of small DFs located either side of the fuselage under the wings. The finish will be in the scheme of the D3 I flew in 1987 which should stand out nicely against most backgrounds.
Here's where we've got to so far:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- boz
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Mike Rolls
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 698
- Thank you received: 573
Mike
The older I get, the better I was!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 15406
- Thank you received: 14306
-
What's (no-cal) ?
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
Eric wrote: Scale catapult launch and arrested landing?
-
What's (no-cal) ?
I don't do boats Eric, runways only!
No-cal is the word used in the USA for profile models. It came from the words no calories. The Flying Aces Club defines it as models with a main body of minimal width. They look pretty awful close up, but in the air, they can look remarkably realistic.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 15406
- Thank you received: 14306
Did you never fancy having a go at a deck landing?
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 10058
- Thank you received: 19043
I have to agree that is a spectacular colour scheme but for my money I think it would look even better with 3 dimensions.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 15406
- Thank you received: 14306
I don't think a skinny Vixen would look right - part of the character of it was the broad flat fuz, with two jet-pipes, black smoke, and that lovely crackly roar at full welly, as the pilot crosses himself before the cat throws him off the end of the ship!
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
Eric wrote: ....Did you never fancy having a go at a deck landing?
It would have been an interesting exercise Eric, but unfortunately I never got the chance. The closest I got was in 1985 when, as Harrier project test pilot at Boscombe down, the Harrier GR5 arrived and the test programme included sea trials. I was short-toured and posted to MoD before I converted to the aircraft... I did do some dry ski-jumps at Yeovilton in the FRS1, though, and that was an interesting interlude.
Quorneng wrote: Andy
I have to agree that is a spectacular colour scheme but for my money I think it would look even better with 3 dimensions.
Agreed on both counts Q! Here's (an unfinished) one I made earlier
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 10058
- Thank you received: 19043
Just doodling at the moment but two 40 mm EDFs in a super light Depron air frame would make an interesting comparison with my 40 mm Venom.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
Quorneng wrote: Just out of interest in your picture the navigators hatch appears to be black and flush (as in the FAW1) whereas on the drawings I have of the FAW2 (with the over wing boom extensions tanks) the nav had a significantly bulged hatch with a substantial glazed area.
Just doodling at the moment but two 40 mm EDFs in a super light Depron air frame would make an interesting comparison with my 40 mm Venom.![]()
Ooooooo....an RC DF Vixen, I'll look forward to seeing that one Q.
For info, the tank extensions on the booms were referred to as the pinion tanks.
The D3 above was a drone aircraft. The observers cockpit was full of electronic wizardry to allow the aircraft to be flown from the ground. The pilot always flew solo, so there was no need to glaze the observers area.
I acted as 'safety pilot' on one or two droned flights but as far as I'm aware the aircraft never flew pilotless.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 15406
- Thank you received: 14306
There wasn't much navigating done at sea, due to lack of any recognizable land-marks! (No motorway signs to read, Andy!)
The ship's radar gave the aircraft the 'steers' to the enemy aircraft, until the WEO found it on his AI18 scope, and guided the pilot in to visual contact. Then, of course, guided the pilot back to the ship, which was not where it was when they left it, unlike a tarmac runway
There was no over-the-horizon capability in those days. just the cannon and the rocket pods. They could carry iron bombs, but that was usually left to the Buccaneers. If I recall, they had limited ability to act as a fuel tanker, for in-flight fuelling other aircraft, but it wasn't used much.
The WEO looked after the fuel levels, selected the weapon to be fired (by the pilot), etc, in his spare time!
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
Flying weight was 25gm including 6.5 gm nose weight. The latter will be replaced by motors, profiler and LiPo.
Motor fitting next and then flight tests under power
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- Visitor
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.