× Here's one for the serious builders. Show us your ideas

WW2 warbird collection.

  • Ex-Member
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
06 Oct 2015 17:36 #1 by Ex-Member
WW2 warbird collection. was created by Ex-Member
well i have nearly finished the first two of the collection.
debating what one to do next.
so far we have the spitfire and the zero.
both 11th scale.



so i was thinking something german and something american, then maybe italian and russian and french and ???
idea's please.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Ex-Member
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
06 Oct 2015 17:42 #2 by Ex-Member
Replied by Ex-Member on topic WW2 warbird collection.
Me109E/FW190D followed by a P-51D or P-40....or even a P-38. :evil: :evil:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Ex-Member
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
06 Oct 2015 17:45 #3 by Ex-Member
Replied by Ex-Member on topic WW2 warbird collection.
that's four :P :P :P
edging towards fw190d and the p40.
:)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Ex-Member
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
06 Oct 2015 18:56 - 06 Oct 2015 19:09 #4 by Ex-Member
Replied by Ex-Member on topic WW2 warbird collection.
Five actually :evil: :evil: But the 190D and P-40 are a good choice, the others are over done to say the least!

I'll look forward to the threads. :cheer: :cheer:
Last edit: 06 Oct 2015 19:09 by .

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
06 Oct 2015 19:33 - 06 Oct 2015 19:34 #5 by Quorneng
Replied by Quorneng on topic WW2 warbird collection.
Russian? How about the Mig3?
An interesting plane. Slightly smaller than the Spitfire but with engine 25% bigger capacity than the even the 36L Griffon ! :woohoo: At 27L it makes you realise just how small the Merlin was.
Although built in some numbers it was considered difficult to fly (easy to get into a irrecoverable spin!) and as many were lost through accident as shot down.
Last edit: 06 Oct 2015 19:34 by Quorneng.
Thanks: Ex-Member

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Ex-Member
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
10 Oct 2015 18:46 #6 by Ex-Member
Replied by Ex-Member on topic WW2 warbird collection.


first two nearly finished.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Ex-Member
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
30 Oct 2015 14:00 #7 by Ex-Member
Replied by Ex-Member on topic WW2 warbird collection.
had a break for 3 weeks and finally got back to the CAD today.

FW 190-d drawings under way.



the spit is ready to test and the zero just needs a canopy making and she is ready to test as well.
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
30 Oct 2015 14:47 #8 by Quorneng
Replied by Quorneng on topic WW2 warbird collection.
That looks nice.
I know I am being picky and you are only after stand off scale but it is missing the one characteristic that was unique to the 'long nose' 190s and Ta 152s. The parallel fuselage insert in the tail end . ;)
Kurt Tank literally inserted a 'plug' to make it longer. The result was the top and bottom fuselage lines were no longer a smooth curve. It was really quite noticeable as shown in this period photograph.
It worked so the fuselage design was never altered and it had the advantage that production could continue with the short nose types using the same jigs. Anyway I expect by that time they had other production worries.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Ex-Member
  • Topic Author
  • Visitor
  • Visitor
21 Nov 2015 21:29 - 21 Nov 2015 21:34 #9 by Ex-Member
Replied by Ex-Member on topic WW2 warbird collection.
After a little break due to editors :P and finishing the Me 109 plan and spitfire plan and zero plan.

i have got back to the next one in the collection :)





will start building after christmas as i want to spend some time on the Sea Hawk first.
Attachments:
Last edit: 21 Nov 2015 21:34 by Ex-Member.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.197 seconds