- Thank you received: 0
Blackburn 1912 Monoplane - 48" (1220mm) PAW Diesel
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- User
-
Today's work continued with tidying up the wings, cutting the wing tip cores and fitting them to the wings:
A trial assembly to see how she looks
Then the fiddly bit - cutting the diagonal bracing struts for the rear end. Blackburn fitted them in the opposite sense on either side of the fus. The 1/32" x 1/8" laminations for the wing tips are at the bottom of the phot:
The empennage was tidied up too, but no photo of that.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
By way of a contrast, I've put the fuselage, an elevator and rudder of the last model I was working on in the picture, a 13" span Westland Woodpigeon......I'll leave you to your own conclusion!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
By way of a contrast, I've put the fuselage, an elevator and rudder of the last model I was working on in the picture, a 13" span Westland Woodpigeon......I'll leave you to your own conclusion!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
Quorneng wrote: Very pretty but looking at the delicacy of the construction I am amazed you are thinking of putting any sort of IC engine in it! :woohoo:
Complex, yes, but I wouldn't have called it delicate Q. Most of the balsa is medium to medium hard grade and there's a good dollop of aliphatic resin on each joint. The covering will be silk over tissue which will further hold it together, so I'm confident it'll stand up well to the required task.
As an aside, the cross bracing is an addition to the original plan, but it's scale and can be seen through the translucent covering, so it should be there. I've also added cores to the wing tips to give them enough strength to cope with the knocks a FF model will inevitably get. They'll show though the covering as non-scale, but I'll take the hit on that as the tips would be very weak otherwise.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
The work in the foreground is an 80% Veron Sea Hawk fuselage under construction - see thread: www.aeromodellers.co.uk/forum/free-fligh...wk-for-rapier-rocket
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
smashing work
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
Further work has included marking out the positions of the UC and wing tubes in the fus - not worth a picture yet as still working out the sizes of the pylon and UC legs and deciding how they will be supported.
Also waiting for a warm day (like last Monday) so I can go outside and do some serious sanding. :lol: :lol:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- martynk
-
- Offline
- Premium Member
-
I love these proper open structures. I have got very blasé over the years with heavy all sheet aerobatic models, it's really nice being back to sticks and tissue again.
This was my last stick and (err) film model - a 1982 Peter Russell STOL - AUW for a 25 sized model of just over 1kg (completed last week).
I thoroughly enjoyed building that
--
Martyn
mad-aeromodeller.blogspot.co.uk/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
Further tubes, piano wire dowels and balsa spacer pieces have been cut to enable a trial assembly to check the wing positioning on the fus (dihedral will be bent into the dowels when ready for final assembly - for setting up there is no dihedral:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
The wings on the model are set at 7 deg incidence, but according to the write up, it needs a few degrees of down on the tailplane. On checking the full size, it appears that the wings are at 5 deg, so the model has been re-drawn and I now have a datum for the wing tubes. The cockpit opening was also wrong on the model plan, so that too has been corrected:
The jigging block for the front wing tube have been cut and glued to the front of former F5, the gap in the jigging block is for the wing pylon:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
I presume the rigging is going to be very real.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- Topic Author
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
Quorneng wrote: Wow!
I presume the rigging is going to be very real.
Oh yes!
There will be some local reinforcement around the tubes and they will eventually be bound to the structure, but as they only have to act in shear, 16 swg (or 1.5mm in this case) should be more than sufficient.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.