- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
A Depron Airbus A350 - 1000 for 76 mm EDFs
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
The motor and mount fixed back into the wing and tested.
The replacement nacelle body is slowly being 'planked' in 2 mm Depron.
Slow going. About 34 planks each individually shaped to fit.
The next big problem will be fitting the nacelle body over the prop. There is only 0.5 mm tip clearance.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- paul d
-
- Offline
- Forum Veteran
-
- Posts: 2074
- Thank you received: 2292
Wouldn't it be easier to plank the parallel parts of the body the other way round?
balsa is best.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
A straight tube whether parallel or tapered and if of sufficient diameter can indeed be rolled from a single piece Depron.
It is quite common in Depron construction to create gentle compound curved structures by using wide but short skin pieces however this does require a reasonably rigid substructure to fix them on to and can only create a true smooth outline if there is sufficient material thickness to be sanded down.
Depron however is not a homogeneous material. It has a surface 'skin' which reveals a coarser internal structure if sanded away. This then has to be filled to give a uniform surface finish.
In my quest for absolute minimum weight I try to retain Depron's original surface if at all possible both for strength (Depron sheet is really a sandwich) and to minimise any surface filling. IMO longitudinal planking is the best way to achieve this.
As a further advantage in a stressed skin structure if the planks are laid in the direction of the major forces it keeps the number of joints in tension to a minimum.
For example the 1.1 m long completely hollow all Depron Bombardier Q400 fuselage centre section has full length planks, the plane was actually scaled to match the size of the Depron sheet, so there are no potential weak joints.
The shorter nose and tail sections were built in a similar way meaning there were only two places that required some extra Depron to achieve a full strength fuselage joint.
The A350 was a later project and with ducted fans had to use 2mm Depron rather than 3 to save still further weight.
The new nacelle fully planked with a first coat of paint.
Ready to be fitted over the prop.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
The damage to the to the motor mounts is quite severe.
To make maters worth the old motor mounts are completely built in with the nacelles and a printed integral with the wing pylon pylons so they had to be cut off.
I intend to reuse at least part of the wing pylon structure not least because it was built in to the wing so the motor mount CAD file had to be modified with a cut off pylon.
The new printed motor mounts (2.5 hours to print each) sitting on the repaired nacelles.
One of 2204 2399kV racing drone motor with its 3x3.5 four bladed prop. The other is still attached to its wiring in the wing.
How to proceed from this point is a question as it was originally all put together and wired up to the wing before it was completely covered and of course to save weight all the wiring is exactly the minimum length so there is absolutely no 'spare' to pull out to easily re attach the motor wires.
This could take some time.
Memo to self, only fly low wing belly landing airliners on 'bowling green' quality grass!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
To mate up securely to the remains of the pylon and allow the motor wires to be installed without disconnecting anything required a rather complex 'bridging piece' to be printed.
I have checked that the motor still runs.
The other side will be a bit more difficult as it the motor has 2 mm bullet connectors and they will get in the way as space inside the pylon is very limited.
The other element was the wing did suffer quite a bit of hidden structural damage as the nacelles were ripped off.
Its all good fun.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 13726
- Thank you received: 14470
Or - land inverted! [badass]
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- paul d
-
- Offline
- Forum Veteran
-
- Posts: 2074
- Thank you received: 2292
balsa is best.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 13726
- Thank you received: 14470
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- paul d
-
- Offline
- Forum Veteran
-
- Posts: 2074
- Thank you received: 2292
balsa is best.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
First job reprint the 3 damaged nose formers then cut back to a structurally sound point.
The remains of the nose are along side. :woohoo:
The original former at this point has been removed and replaced with a wider 4mm version rather than 2mm to give a 'surface' to attach the new skin planks.
To be honest it was only when I cut open the nose I realised just how 'light weight' the A350 is with 'skinny' printed formers and just a 2mm Depron skin.
Apart from the wing mounting the inside is empty!
.
Once the nose is reapired I will investigate what might be wrong with the RH motor and/or ESC that apparently caused the crash.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
Fist I openned up the fuselage underside to get at the ESCs. From this I was able to determine that th eproblem was indeed the motor as it would not run any better using another ESC.
To extract the motor the whole nacelle and pylon has to be cut away and then the front part of the nacelle cut off to be reused.
The pylon & motor mount have to be broken up to disconnect the wires and to get at the motor bolts.
At least this picture clearly shows what was wrong with it.
Definitely a "cooked" winding. :woohoo:
To make things worse it appears this particular LDPOWER 2204 2300kV motor is a 'discontinued product' as far as HK is concerned but then I did buy the original CW/CCW pair in 2010! :woohoo:
I do have a spare 2205 2300kV CW motor that is actually 2 g lighter. The moutings are identical so the printer is currently printing a new intergrated motor mount and pylon.
It had better fly after all this!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
The reprinted and painted 'afterbody' that resticts the exhaust nozzle to 95% of the FSA.
Just as well I kept all the files both FreeCad and Stl.
It all works when connected to its ESC in the wing.
The motor mount is almost ready to be glued into the wing.
Shoukd not take too much longer to finish.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
The rebuilt nose.
The new RH motor installed in the nacelle and remounted on the wing.
Still some comstic bits, like clear lacuer on the repainted bits and as this picture shows some medial work to replace the tips of those dreaded curly wing tips.
Increadibly delicate but not the result of flight damge, they just simply carch on everything! :woohoo:
Once done I can return to getting the HE162 to fly, maybe!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.