- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
Depron Heinkel HE162
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
All very smooth & bland!
One aileron is complete and the parts cut for the second but will not be fitted yet.
A started made on the rear fuselage.
It will be built in exactly the same way as the centre part except the planks will be extremely tapered.
All the plans are now printed out including the 'developed' views of the tail plane and fin to give the correct size so it should just be building from now on. The only printed parts are likely to be the nose and tail cones.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
The half tail section planked, lifted from the plan and the other half of the formers added.
Once the planking is fully completed it can be added to the centre section.
The fuselage is too 'fat' to hold so I expect it will need some 'bowling ball' figure hole grips like I did on the AN124.
Probably the tail plane and fins next although they will only be finally fitted along with the wings to make sure they all line up. If possible to save rear end weight I would like to work the elevators with just one servo.
A printed miniature CV joint?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- paul d
-
- Offline
- Forum Veteran
-
- Posts: 2074
- Thank you received: 2292
Edit: Bungee assisted launch???
balsa is best.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
A bungee could certainly be made to work but I am not sure I would be confident doing it on an untried plane's maiden.
Just had a "oh! no" moment with the aileron servos. I decided to 'y' connect them (outside the wing) and extend with a lead long enough to reach the cockpit area. All joints soldered and shrink wrapped. Connected it up to a servo tester and had very hesitant movement on both servos. :woohoo: I had tested both individually before closing up the wing.
Tried another servo tester then another power source all with no improvement. Then added another servo to the spare servo tester port and that worked normally so it had to be a soldered joint somewhere. Took off all the shrink wrap and touched all the solder joints with a iron still no improvement.
Finally unsoldered all the joints and re soldered the servo plug directly onto the Y connection. The servos worked perfectly. The problem was a bad contact within the long extension wire itself!
Have some more wire on order.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
Nothing fixed it is all just positioned.
I may regret it but there are no rudders, it saves the weight of two servos right at the tail, so it will have to be flown bank and yank. On the plus side there will be some 'mechanical' aileron differential.
Cockpit next which will give me an idea of the weight needed up front to achieve a workable CofG. I suspect it will mean everything crammed right up in the nose!
It also looks pretty big so I hay have to revise my plan for it to be a 'one piece' plane. I will have to have a good 'think' about the best way to do it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- paul d
-
- Offline
- Forum Veteran
-
- Posts: 2074
- Thank you received: 2292
balsa is best.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Rich griff
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 299
- Thank you received: 344
Good job it malfunctioned now !
Superb job and engineering, gunna do a jindi next, with RC trolly.. ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 13726
- Thank you received: 14467
Get the Haynes out, and all the wires are shown black!
Which one is which?
AAARGH!
(still haven't found where the fuses are hidden!)
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- paul d
-
- Offline
- Forum Veteran
-
- Posts: 2074
- Thank you received: 2292
Rich, all due respect but your post made no sense at all..
balsa is best.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 13726
- Thank you received: 14467
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- paul d
-
- Offline
- Forum Veteran
-
- Posts: 2074
- Thank you received: 2292
balsa is best.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
I believe it will be possible to break it down into 3 pieces.
1. The fuselage and tail.
2. The one piece wing bolted on to it.
3. The engine nacelle bolted on top of the fuselage over the wing.
Using M4 nylon bolts it should only cost a few extra grams.
Just for fun a view inside the fuselage from the cockpit rear wall towards the tail.
The only thing inside all that space will be the elevator and aileron servo wires. :ohmy:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
To save Depron I used 'printed' formers although they are a few grams heavier but the extra weight in the nose will not go amiss. The big problem the printed formers is you cannot stick pins onto them to hold the planks in place so each plank has to be taped in position. As the glue has to dry before any tape can be removed before the next plank can be fitted. The result is the rate of planking is slowed down by at least 50%.
Should be complete tomorrow no problem but I am definitely not looking forward to planking the other half.
I have also elected to create no battery hatch as I simply don't know where it will need to go.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
The all Depron former is a temporary lash up and will be removed before the nose is added to the fuselage.
Note the nose cone also acts as the initial former so it is printed as a 'half' as well.
Just because I made a video of it printing.
As it takes over 20 minutes to print the video only includes short sections at 25, 50, 75 and 100% completion.
In the finished nose I am expecting the battery to actually go in the nose cone. :woohoo:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
Made good progress basically because I did virtually nothing else however the nose is complete and fixed in place so........
Note the two elevator servos sitting on the centre of the tail plane and, yes, the battery will have to go that far forward. :ohmy:
The Little Bee ESC and the Optp BEC together only weigh 15 g and the rx will be about the same but will make just a small nose weight contribution but it does all at least appear 'doable although there is still quite a bit to do'.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.