- Posts: 307
- Thank you received: 690
PA-18 Super Cub for the BMFA R/C Scale Indoor Nats
- Septic
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
I have reworked the fuselage drawing to incorporate the carbon rods, and some carbon tissue re-inforcing. I have also made the stringers in the correct position to allow the lower door to be open, should I wish to go that far!!
I am seeing Dylan this weekend, I will ask him if he could cut all those ribs, I could also let him have a sheet of competition grade 1/16 balsa to cut them from
Cheers
Danny
tap - tap.......rivet
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Septic
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 307
- Thank you received: 690
Cheers
Danny
tap - tap.......rivet
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Septic
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 307
- Thank you received: 690
On the grounds that I cannot find concrete proof in any direction I am going with the profile used on my three view and that is flat bottomed. I have made the rib height as per the three views.
Andy S has sent me a note suggesting my fus is over engineered and I am thinking like an outdoor modeller :woohoo: So I might have to reduce some parts
Cheers
Danny
tap - tap.......rivet
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
This site tends to be my source for wing sections.
I try to back it up with other references if I can find any.
However the issue with Cub/Super Cub appears to be even more complex in that Piper officially referred to it as "USA 35B mod".
The last post in this forum suggests the modification was to increase the vertical coordinates of 35B by 4% which appears to be referencing a reliable source.
I can find no explanation why Piper did this over the standard USA 35B used on the Taylor craft wing that the Cub evolved from.
Of course apart from the slight under camber the USA 35B and Clark Y are very similar and I would suggest completely unnoticeable at the scale of indoor RC.
My only reason for raising the topic of wing sections would be to allow you to impress the judges (or maybe not!) on the level of its detail accuracy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Septic
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 307
- Thank you received: 690
I will needless to say not do the undercamber bit, as i doubt you would really even see it at the scale i am working too
Thanks again for your help
Cheers
Danny
tap - tap.......rivet
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Septic
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 307
- Thank you received: 690
tap - tap.......rivet
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- one tenor
-
- Offline
- Forum Veteran
-
- johnpcalex@gmail.com
Anything will fly given enough power
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Septic
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 307
- Thank you received: 690
Cheers
Danny
tap - tap.......rivet
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eric
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 13726
- Thank you received: 14467
if you are calm and collected when all about you are going berserk - you've missed something important!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Septic
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 307
- Thank you received: 690
tap - tap.......rivet
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Quorneng
-
- Offline
- Forum Master
-
- Posts: 9436
- Thank you received: 19043
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Septic
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 307
- Thank you received: 690
tap - tap.......rivet
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Septic
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 307
- Thank you received: 690
Thought I would start with the fuselage formers:
I am sure this is all old hat for you guys but just in case. Vertical lines are drawn up from the profile view, where I want bulkheads. These lines are reflected in my 45 degree reference line to draw horizontal lines across the fus on my plan view showing the bulkhead position there.
I draw a reference line under the profile view and I transfer a line showing the bottom, the datum and the top boundaries of the bulkhead. The lines are referenced to the datum. Then you draw lines showing the width of the bulkheads on the plan view, where the bulkheads are. These lines are then also transfered to the datum under the profile view. This will give us what I call bounding boxes. These boxes are the maximum outside size of the bulkheads. Hopefully that will become clearer when I draw them in tomorrow.
Does that make any sense at all?
Cheers
Danny
tap - tap.......rivet
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Ex-Member
- User
-
- Thank you received: 0
This type of aircraft is normally regulated by the Light Aircraft Association (ex-Popular Flying Association). Owners are allowed to make whatever changes they see fit provided that they are 'signed-off' as fit-to-fly by the local LAA inspector or for major changes, the LAA Engineering Department. As a consequence, no two aircraft are the same.
As the model is being built for competition, a look at the rules before you make any design decisions is essential.
During static judging, the judges will compare the model to the photographs you have of the subject aircraft. So, even if your photographs are limited, make sure that whatever you do matches the photographs you have, especially if you decide on adding something that is found on a different subject aircraft.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.